I know. I know. It not often you get asked for your opinion. However, I also know you'll give it-- repercussions be da%m$$. Well, today right now, I want to hear your opinions.
I promise the only repercussion might be I roll my eyes if it's really really...stupid. Ah, but I do have faith in you.
Soon, I will be releasing another book and I am having book cover anxiety. I need your help. Please take look at the two covers and tell me true--Yes--No-- maybe so.
Book setting: A Native American romance in the 1800's.
A furiously proud Indian warrior that kills Cassie's husband, and takes her infant son. Hate for the white people fill him, and yet he claimed to be
Cassie’s protector. In reality she was his captive. She was his enemy, but ...the child must live...
He now needed Cassie to accomplish that goal. So, why did he decide to demand her body, wasn’t it just lust? When lust grew he now wanted her heart and mind. Not anyone or anything would stop him from his goal. When she refused, he decided to take them one small piece at a time.
A woman alone with her husband dead and son abducted. She stood before the one she hated. Her only goal …the child must live...
Cassie soon discovered she had two battles to fight. She needed to protect herself from him.. He had total control over her life. Now he was demanding her surrender to him. She also needed to save her son. She would do whatever it took to protect him. Only the ultimate mother’s sacrifice would save the child, but would it save her from him?
So there, you have it. If you like one or the other please say so... If you dislike both then design one for me and we'll re-vote. All comments will go into the pot and someone will receive an ARC copy. ( only if you want it)
Looking forward to your much impressive opinions. Thank you in advance!